|
by M.V.
Lee Badgett, Ph.D. and Josh A. Goldfoot
Marriage is a personal and emotional commitment two
people make to each other. And marrying someone often
is a public announcement of that commitment.
With its mix of benefits and obligations, marriage
encourages individuals to form economically stable family
units that will provide life«s necessities for its members.
Our nation's health care, pension systems, and social
safety net have all been constructed around it.
Encouraging economically stable families has obvious
social benefits. Children have increased access to parental
resources, both economic and social. Adults will likely
improve their own standard of living, share in the responsibility
of child-rearing, and have built-in financial support
during tough times.
Evidence further suggests that married adults are healthier
and live longer than single ones.1
As well, business and industry get a more stable customer
base and a stronger current and future labor force.
Though difficult to quantify, these are just some of
the social benefits of marriage.
The institution of marriage promotes economic stability
not just for heterosexual couples, but would also do
so for same gender couples who will marry if allowed.
Moreover, the costs of recognizing same gender marriages
are likely to be negligible.
The failure to legally recognize those marriages undermines
the larger social purpose of marriage and will be financially
costly to any government. Through tax revenues and expenditures,
marriage has a significant impact on governmental budgets
-- particularly in terms of tax revenue and payments
for means-tested assistance programs.
In this analysis, keep in mind that the state budget
represents transfers of income throughout the state,
and measuring the overall social impact -- on children,
adults, and the health of our economy -- is not as simple
as measuring changes in taxes and expenditures.
How many same-sex couples will marry?
Very little useful information exists for predicting
how many same gender couples would marry if given the
opportunity. We expect that couples will weigh the pros
and cons.
The advantages of marrying include social approval,
increased relationship security, and access to spousal
benefits. Another advantage is that it creates a legal
family relationship for inheritance, hospital visitation,
and other purposes.
Disadvantages of marriage might include higher federal
income tax payments or loss of eligibility for some
social programs. however, available evidence suggests
that such disadvantages at most have a small effect
on the propensity to marry.2
Although all of these factors are relevant in some
way for most couples, individuals will place different
values on them. In the end, some lesbian or gay couples
will decide to marry and others will not. Not knowing
how many couples will marry, however, does not prevent
us from estimating the economic impact of those marriages
and the cost of nonrecognition.
Most of the significant benefits of marriage do not
involve direct financial costs for the State or local
businesses. For example, with no cost to anyone else
marriage can save couples thousands of dollars in attorneys'
fees for writing wills, living together contracts, and
other legal documents to protect their relationship,
property, and children. Other benefits, like the right
to hospital visitation or to make medical decisions
for an incapacitated spouse, involve no financial gain
to the couple or loss to anyone else, but have obvious
value to a patient and his or her spouse.
For the other potential costs of recognition versus
nonrecognition, we start with the potential cost per
couple. We then put the potential cost into the larger
social context to provide a sense of its size and importance.
Marriage and the Social Safety Net.
A number of economic supports are created by marriage,
among them:
- Many employers offer health and pension benefits
to their employees and their spouses and children.
- Married couples must provide mutual financial support.
- Marriage automatically creates property, spousal
inheritance, and social security survivor benefit
rights in the event of divorce or death, all of which
enhance the economic security of the family.
These private benefits of marriage have allowed state
and federal governments to construct safety net programs
that catch individuals when their families cannot provide
adequate housing, health care, food, or income because
of some financial misfortune, death or unemployment.
These programs require that employed or financially
able spouses contribute to the family's maintenance.
But if a marriage is not legally recognized, no spousal
support can be expected, increasing the state's financial
burden for that family.
Next Page | 1, 2,
3
NOTES:
1. C. Ross, J. Mirowsky, and K. Goldsteen,
"Impact of the Family on Health: Decade in Review,"
Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 52, Nov. 1990.
[Go Back]
2. D. Sjoquist and M. Walker, "The
Marriage Tax and the Rate and Timing of Marriage,"
and J. Alm and L. Whittington, "Does the Income Tax
Affect Marital Decisions?", National Tax Journal,
Vol. XLVIII, No. 4, Dec. 1995. R. Moffitt, "Incentive
Effects of theU.S. Welfare System: A Review," Journal
of Economic Lit., Vol. 30, No. 1, Mar. Î92, pp. 1-61.
[Go Back] |